Gaining competitive advantage through new product development capability in Malaysian Government Linked Companies

Authors

  • Nik Herda Nik Abdullah Taylor’s Business School, Taylor’s University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.1.1.37-49

Keywords:

Competitive advantages, dynamic capabilities, Government linked companies, new product development capability

Abstract

A new product development capability can be shown through organisational routines that shape the processes of innovation, which are aimed to reconfigure a firm’s product portfolio. It is aimed to create a concrete physical asset from an idea and this relates to the innovation that is the mechanism by which firms to produce new products, processes and systems that essential in order to adapt market changes, technologies and types of competition. New product development capability aids corporate managers plan and execute strategies successfully while securing sustainable competitive advantages. This paper aims to explore the extent of top management emphasis on the measures of new product development that are deemed important for business survival and sustainability in the context of Malaysian government-linked companies (GLCs). A questionnaire survey was distributed with a response rate of 47%. Findings revealed that design a high quality of product or service is the most important measures. This revealed that it is a common exercise for Malaysian GLCs to put high emphasis on the importance of the quality of the new products or services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, N. H. N. (2017). The influence of dynamic capabilities on strategic management accounting practices and its effect on value creation in Government Linked Companies. Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Abdullah, N. H. N., & Said, J. (2016). Value Creation and Government Linked Companies : Towards High Level of Accountability. Information.

Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20(S1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Amir, A. M., Ahmad, N. N. N., & Mohamed, M. H. S. (2010). An Investigation on PMS Attributes in Service Organizations in Malaysia. International Journal of Production and Performance Management, 59(8), 734–756.

Arumugam, G. S., Guptan, V., & Shanmugam, B. (2011). Market orientation in a GLC: Evidence from Malaysia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 9(2), 51–62.

Awang, Z. (2014). A handbook on SEM for academicians and practitioners: the step by step practical guides for the beginners. MPWS Rich Resources. Bandar Baru Bangi.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Barreto, I. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776

Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211231344

Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026

Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). Strategy and Strategic Management Accounting: an Investigation of Organizational Configurations. Manchester Business School Research Seminar.

Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2010). Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(8), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.09.006

Cinquini, L., & Tenucci, A. (2010). Strategic management accounting and business strategy: a loose coupling? Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(2), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911011048772

Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1990). The power of product integrity. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 107–118.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications. London. https://doi.org/3109300305073

Danneels, E. (2008). Organizational antecedents of second order competences. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 153–164.

Davila, T. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4–5), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-3

Gani, A. A., Awang, K. W., & Mohamad, A. (2015). SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES Attributes of Successful Public Participation in Planning for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas : A Modified Delphi Study, 23, 49–64.

Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., & Zhang, J. L. (2011). Do CFOs Have Style? An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Individual CFOs on Accounting Practices*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1141–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01097.x

Gosselin, M. (1997). The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 105–122.

Griffith, D. a., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A Resource Perspective of Global Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490987

Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. a. (2015). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133

Kadir, M. R. A., Abidin, Z. Z., Ramli, A. R., & Surbaini, K. N. (2014). Factors Influencing A Business Towards Zakat Payment In Malaysia. International Journal of Science Commerce and Humanities, 2(3), 147–156.

Lau, Y. W., & Tong, C. Q. (2008). Are Malaysian Government-Linked Companies ( GLCs ) Creating Value ? International Applied Economics and Management Letters, 1(1), 9–12.

Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing Innovation Capability in Organisations: a Dynamic Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427

Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities : a Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Special), 111–125.

Maelah, R., & Ibrahim, D. N. (2007). Factors Influencing Activity Based Costing ( Abc ), 4(2), 113–124.

MINDA (Malaysian Directors Academy). (2009). Mid-Term Progress Review: GLCs are Much More Resilient and Focused on Catalysing Growth and Realising the Programme’s 2015 Aspirations, July(2).

Mitchell, M., & Skrzypacz, A. (2013). We analyze a model of industry evolution where the number of, 1–35.

Mokhtar, A. (2005). The Malay Way of Business Change. Economist, 376(8440), 50.

Mokhtar, N., & Sulaiman, M. (2012). Environmental reporting practices of Malaysian government linked companies (GLCs). International Journal of Economics and Management.

Oliveira, P., & Roth, A. V. (2012). The influence of service orientation on B2B e-service capabilities: An empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01256.x

Parnell, J. A. (2011). Strategic Capabilities, Competitive Strategy and Performance among Retailers in Argentina, Peru and the United States. Management Decision, 49(1), 130–155.

Rungi, M. (2014). The impact of capabilities on performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2013-0202

Rungi, M., & Kolk, A. (2012). Capability development - No path, response to competition: The cross-case of Google, Ericsson, Microsoft and Nokia. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 689–693. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2012.6837827

Said, J., & Jaafar, N. H. B. (2014). Accountability in Government Linked Companies: An Empirical Finding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.037

Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect for environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 179–203.

Sorensen, A. (2015). Social Media for Social Good : Value Creation in Social Media Based Cause Brand Communities, (December).

Swink, M., & Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.03.001

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2007). MANAGEMENT, 18(7), 509–533.

The Putrajaya Committee GLC High Performance (PCG). (2007). News. Retrieved from http://www.pcg.gov.my/news.asp

The Putrajaya Committee GLC High Performance (PCG). (2014). GLCs delivering high performance and catalysing inclusive growth.

The Putrajaya Committee GLC High Performance (PCG). (2016). Overview.

Ting, I. W. K., & Lean, H. H. (2012). Capital structure of government-linked companies in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.5944

Wilson, C. (2012). The Integrated Propulsion Strategy Theory: A Resources, Capability and Industrial Organization. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 13(5), 159–171. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1315304099/D6CA32EDCE1A4F54PQ/19?accountid=15035%5Cnhttp://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/2911687051/fmt/pi/rep/NONE?hl=dynamic,capabil__________,dynamic,capabil__________,structure+conduct+performance&cit:auth=

Wu, L. Y. (2010). Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.007

Zin, N. M., & Sulaiman, S. (2011). Government-linked Companies Blue Book ( GLCs Blue Book ) as a complement to Balanced Scorecard ( BSC ) in the Government-Linked Companies transformation program. International Conference on Business and Economics Research 2010, 1, 294–297.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-28

How to Cite

Nik Abdullah, N. H. (2019). Gaining competitive advantage through new product development capability in Malaysian Government Linked Companies. Indonesian Journal of Economics, Social, and Humanities, 1(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.1.1.37-49

Issue

Section

Articles